Here at the beginning of the twenty-first century, over fifty million household dogs live in the United States. Europe houses an estimated thirty-five million. … If I add Canadian dogs to these populations, I get one hundred million household dogs in the industrial West.

In the United States each year, households produce 3,700,000 puppies. Hobby breeders produce another two million, and half a million are produced by commercial breeders for department store and other retail sales. That is a turnover of 6,200,000 dogs a year. If the population is not going up or down, then 6,200,000 dogs die every year. That is a 12 percent annual mortality rate, which for a species with a life span of a little over ten years is a low mortality rate in the wild.

In the United states, four million of these dogs spend part of a year in animal shelters. For 2,400,000 of them it is the last stop. Almost 5 percent of our companion animals are dogs nobody wants, and they get “put to sleep.” Culled. Again, disaster for the individual dog. Some of this culling may be related to competition between people and dogs for food resources. People soon decide they can’t afford the dog, and turn them over to humane societies

- Dogs, Lorna Coppinger

Is a five percent disposal rate really that much of a concern? The bleeding heart loud mouths would have us believe that there is an “overpopulation” problem and that it is an epidemic. So much so that they demand for (near)universal sterilization laws, moral outrage at hobby breeders, misplaced hatred of purebreds and the people who buy them.

Nathan Winograd has shown again and again that many dogs that are killed don’t need to be, but the onus is on shitty shelters that don’t get the job done, mostly because they are defeatist from the outset. Huge strides have already been made in sterilizing pets and in lowering the percent of pets that are abandoned. But this number will never be zero.

Will the bleeding heart loud mouths not be satisfied until it is, as in never? Will they be like the Christians and the Jews waiting for the next coming of their prophet/savior? And will they, in their growing frustration as their dogma fails to deliver success year after year, become even more preachy and unreasonable?

Evidence suggests that they will. Here’s a comment posted recently that is filled with references to PeTA’s veritable Book of Revelations (which documents the Pet Overpopulation Armageddon we are now living in according to their dogma):

Of course Joe Biden killed a dog [by buying a puppy instead of rescuing from a shelter]. Are you all delusional? Can you not count? Joe could have adopted a dog at a shelter or from a rescuer and opened up another spot for one of the millions of dogs dumped at shelters by people, and saved a dog from being euthanized due to over crowding. There is NO justification for breeding a dog when millions of adoptable dogs are put to death. All 3 of my rescue dogs were well behaved and lived to 15 + years old, so don’t tell me about damaged, sick dogs. Most of the people I know with “pure breeds” encounter health problems at age 7 or 8 and behavioral problems earlier due to inbreeding. The whole notion of breeding a specific type of dog is archaic.

- Comment by Janice — December 12, 2008 @ 6:41 pm

Janice is a perfect example of a bleeding heart loud mouth with a savior complex. Since feeding her ego with 3 rescue dogs wasn’t sufficient (and how could it be, rescuing a dog does nothing except save that dog) to even influence the dog abandonment issue, she’s now grasping at totalitarian measures to bring about her “my bleeding heart is more important than your freedom, so I’m going to force my uniformed blather down your throat even though what I demand you do has never been effective at accomplishing the goals I want” religion.

I’ve already debunked the “buy a dog, kill a dog” fallacy. (Myth of Christmas Puppies, Parroting PeTA, Buy From a Breeder, and Adopt a PeTA pet and kill 248 more). This is a displacement tactic used by PeTA to blame someone else because they don’t want to take responsibility for killing 97% of the animals they take in. Have no doubt, it’s the shelters who kill the dogs, and in almost all cases, it’s not because they have to. It’s because they want to. Thinking you’re opening up a spot by capitulating to the kill shelters is like appeasing a terrorist. You think you’re saving lives but you’re really just making a deal with evil. You are allowing them to operate and continue their extortion.

Would you buy drugs from your neighborhood street dealer simply to take that small amount of product off the market?

As I’ve shown (Garbage In, Garbage Out), the major causes of abandoned dogs are HUMAN problems, not problems with the dogs themselves and not problems with purchased dogs or purebred dogs or even pet store dogs, or dogs given as pets.

So given that humans are imperfect and will always be such, what do we expect the natural rate of culling should be?

In economics, there is a concept called the “natural rate of unemployment.”

The natural rate of unemployment is the healthy unemployment rate that will always occur in an economy, unless it is severely overheated. Some level of unemployment results from:

1. Frictional unemployment that comes from job turnover,
2. Structural unemployment that is caused by a mis-match between job skills and job availability,
3. Unemployment caused by minimum wages laws and unions.

In short, it’s economist speak for “the unemployed will always be with us” and observationally, economists place the rate at between 4% and 6%.

Given that, do you really think that the bleeding heart loud mouths are justified in breathing their fire and spitting their venom on the rest of us? I think their outrage is entirely disproportionate to the size of the problem. I think the targets of their rage are also inappropriate and thus their rage is ineffectual. They aren’t going to change the kill rate by even one dog by putting breeders out of business, ending the concept of purebred dogs or even reaching saturation levels of desexing dogs.

The first way to cut the rate is to tackle the issues that actually cause people to relinquish dogs: Moving, landlord issues, cost of pet maintenance, no time for pets, inadequate facilities, too many pets at home, pet illness, personal problems, biting, no homes for litter mates.

The second way to cut the rate is to improve the ef
ficiency of shelter placement programs: adopt the entire no-kill paradigm.

Here’s a graph of the number of people who read my feed each day and who don’t count for the site stats since they don’t load the hit counter when they read the feed.

I know this is nothing impressive, especially since I started a website that would get tens of thousands of unique users per day and had 14,000 active members posting several hundred new threads and generating Gigabytes of traffic on a daily basis. But it’s still rather flattering to think that there are, perhaps, twenty people who subscribe to the feed and actually want to be kept apprised of new things I say. I’m sure I’m making a big deal out of those few people, but it’s an honor to me.

I’ve given some of the best speeches in my life in front of only one other person, some lay judge volunteering their time on a weekend, and I’ve gotten a standing ovation in front of a crowd of over 10,000 people. When you’ve tasted the bliss of the later, it makes the isolation of the former rather discomforting. What good is it to say great things when there is no one to hear the words? And if you’re not trying to say important things, why open your mouth? Your subscriptions and comments on this blog might not number in the tens of thousands, but they are really the only payment I ask and will receive, and they’re enough.

When I started this blog 131 days (and some 100 posts) ago on August 22nd, I had no idea what direction it’d go in. Although I certainly got the name of my blog from my dogs and always intended to talk about them, I didn’t even mention the animal species in my first and defining post. I naively thought that I’d talk about more than dogs, since I’ve been known to debate just about anything, especially the no-nos of religion and politics.

But the dogs interest me, and I guess I enjoy writing about dog politics, dog language, and dog religion more than the human equivalents. After all, this endeavor is an escapist retreat from being inundated with human affairs during the rest of the day, and it’s allowed me to keep up on dog matters in the “off season.”

In looking back on where I’ve taken you these many days, and where you’ve taken me, I figured now would be a good time to say a few thank yous and highlight some favorites from the past year*. For purposes of this discussion, 131 days constitutes the “last year.”

Since traffic is the gold we bloggers are panning out of the Internet stream, I must send a thank you to Pet Connection, Terrierman, Flyball Blog, and CardiParty for sending me some of their mine tailings. Besides Google those fine folks sent me most of you fine folks. I must also tip my hat to Life’s Curveballs, doggy.blogsome.com, PetMonologues.com, Johann the Agility Dog, Underdogged, and coloradohurricane for their gracious links in.

If content theft is the sincerest form of flattery, then I should be very flattered that my content has show up on a handful of fake blog/Google bomb websites used to promote various nefarious erectile dysfunction knock off drugs from foreign countries and the like. If it’s good enough to steal, then it must be good enough to read.

While outlinks are not my main focus, and while I could certainly do a better job of hyperlinking my posts than I do, Feedburner conveniently keeps track of the most popular posts that send you off somewhere else on the net after you read them, and here they are:

Top 10 Posts you read and then clicked on:
No Border Collie Left Behind
Sheeple Admit They’re Hobbyists
Bring Military Mascots Home
Too many working dogs, too little work
On Thin Ice
Meet My Dogs
Breeding Ethics 2
GPS Dog Art
Breeding Ethics 1

Besides ranting, I do quite enjoy playing around with Photoshop. Not only does it make all of my photos look better, it’s a vehicle for creative outlet and it allows me to make images that are as punchy as my prose. Although this piece wasn’t the most complicated photoshop I’ve done this year, it is perhaps the most seamless and elegant.

My Favorite Photoshop of the Year:

Dmitri Mendeleev ponders the perfect Vodka.
(thanks to my elite Photoshop skills and a painting by Ilya Repin)

Right now, my blog is supposedly worth $4,516.32 … not that anyone is making any offers. That means that I accrue about $34.50 of value each day. I guess I shouldn’t quit my day job yet, and a Border Wars, Inc. IPO is not on the horizon, but making a virtual $34.50 for giving you my ten cents each day seems like a pretty good return on investment.

The one thing that disappoints me about the blogosphere versus the forum and list serve worlds is that it’s a very unidirectional medium. Even on the largest pet topic blogs, the comments are rarely a place that people debate and hash out topics mentioned in the post. I long for a little back and forth.

Perhaps I’ll pick up that debate I was having with Terrierman right before I ran off to Spain and had to drop the issue. There’s nothing like picking a fight to get a little comment action going. I’m rather surprised that I say a lot of what I would consider controversial things about Border Collies and it takes a post about Jesus to get anyone to post a comment!

Since this blog is still on a pretty good growth curve, I realize that many of you joined up after I published some of my more important pieces and since it’s not easy to sift through all of the backlog to find them, I’ll make an effort in the new year to reprint some of the best posts of the past. Here’s a few that are fundamental to my beliefs from the last year:

Most important post of the year: The Third Estate of the Border Collie

Runners up: The Spoils of the Dog War, Capturing the Spoils,

Favorite Photograph of the year:

Although my favorite photo of the year wasn’t even taken this year, nor last, I am still amazed to have taken it. It was shot in my back yard with a Canon D60 with a 75-300 lens. I was perhaps 30 to 50 feet away at the time and the Hawk seemed little concerned with my presence. This hawk was one of three that were raised in my yard by two adult Swainson’s hawks that nested in an Elm tree against the driveway.

The tree came down after they had grown up and moved on, the final victim of Dutch Elm disease and the last of some 30 elm trees on the acre and some to meet such and end. The hawks have come back each year and found nests in the area, once in the neighbor’s yard, and another a mile away. It always makes me nostalgic when I’ll see one of them soaring overhead or swooping down for a squirrel or rabbit kill when I’m on a walk or a drive in the neighborhood.

There are a few posts I never thought I’d write, they certainly weren’t “in me” waiting to get out when I started this blog, unlike many of the posts that were percolating in my head for quite some time.

Most unlikely post of the year: Redemption: Eyes Open and Crying

Most interesting post to research: The Language of Dog Series

Now, sometimes your rivals in debate make it all too easy for you, proving your points without you having to say a word or letting important information (admissions contrary to interest) slip without even realizing it.

The following posts literally wrote themselves, because well, I didn’t have to write much of anything to score major points:

Most interesting admissions contrary to interest: Sheeple Admit They’re Hobbyists, Too Many Working Dogs, Too Little Work, Versatility “Dangerous” to the ABCA, PeTA Puts Out

Most controversial post of the year: Barbie Collies Can Herd? (original post)

This post was so controversial, the trialer and breeder featured in the post didn’t want to be identified! As such, I agreed to pull the post until last year’s season was over, and it’s over. As a special treat for the new year, I’m bringing back the full old post so you can read with delight about beautiful “barbie” collies that really can herd sheep.

So, that’s the “year” in review. Hopefully more of you will pipe up and comment in the new year and I’ll try to keep the posts coming.

Good riddance 2007, Here’s for a prosperous and bountiful 2008!